hey there wait a minute mr @Posty@aus.social

Twitter is just software. Written by a company hostile to their own users, who could ban nazi's in a snap, but don't. I'm here because most are. Let's change - On the Internet, you can be in two places at once. The least that could happen is Twitter improves. #DepreciateTwitter

This feels like more of a serving suggestion than a reprimand

Folks, where the slicey boi at

Hey @PMalinauskasMP@twitter.com, how come you didn’t mention this on Twitter? A lot of people here would love to hear how you plan to uhhh… stop automation?

Absolutely not.

Bright bad. Now with… Japanese period anime?
Ping @thelindsayellis@twitter.com

In conclusion, @ScottMorrisonMP@twitter.com absolutely does not, never has joked about this & can't take a joke whatsoever. If he did, he'd release both requests instead of stonewalling.
He can, any time, release these two requests.
Australia, contact your local MP:
#FreeTheEngadineTwo

2) @pmc_gov_au@twitter.com & @thepmo@twitter.com argue that THE VERY TERMS "engadine mcdonalds" & "engadine maccas" do not relate to official business and therefore wont search for them. scomo has made it official business. In addition, any assumed reasons for request are irrelevant per FOI guidelines.

IT WOULD HAVE BEEN MUCH EASIER TO SAY THEY DON'T EXIST AGAIN, But at the time, scomo hadn't brought up the topic himself on talk radio. you see, you don't bring up things that you want to talk about unprompted without planning. this request would likely reveal plan/strategy docs.

You see, @camtyeson@twitter.com already put in a freedom of information request in 2019, and at the time there was no result. Now the story is, "if they exist", i can't have them because they're "not documents of a minister"
https://www.pedestrian.tv/news/engadine-maccas-plaque-doo-doo-ass/
PS Cam, can you post the original FOI? 😁

I give them a prod again via email, because it's near deadline, FINALLY, A RESPONSE.

Oh wait it's almost identical to the first one.

Again, it asserts "the documents, *if they exist* are not documents of a minister"

This confirms that they do exist, I will explain why 1)

The phone number matches the other office. It appears that both departments may just be staffed by one person. who knows, all the email sigs are anonymous. "Adviser, Senior Adviser, FOI Adviser".
I am not convinced that it's not just the same guy changing hats.

more time passes. I get a reply from @thepmo@twitter.com. I'm advised that the @pmc_gov_au@twitter.com does FOI work for @thepmo@twitter.com. So... if you've been following, when i emailed @pmc_gov_au@twitter.com, they offered to refer the matter... to themselves? cool, not confusing at all.

So I asked @OAICgov@twitter.com if it was subject to a review - they advised no, they only prodded about the deadline. how misleading by @pmc_gov_au@twitter.com! OAIC helpfully asked if i wanted a review, which I do! I really wish that the dept would just give me the documents in the first place :(

I found the @pmc_gov_au@twitter.com office tried to confuse me by saying I'd already got the OAIC involved earlier and implied there was no further review. proves they only replied because they were prodded by an external agency.

Squid game

It’s good

Stunning news I know

*wonders out loud to the internet*
How long would you have to DDOS a NFT URL before the host finally gives up?

for comparison - @NetflixANZ@twitter.com's servers appear to cope just fine btw.

went to watch foundation but I'm in the middle of nowhere, and @Apple@twitter.com's CDN's are garbage and cant stream over my admittedly crap connection of about 2mbit, but their download option is only on my phone, looks broken when i leave it for half an hour.
*points dns to 8.8.8.8* yarr