It's been more than 30 days, this makes it a deemed refusal and literally I am to take this as if the minister refused the request himself.
why don't you want to talk about engadine maccas @ScottMorrisonMP@twitter.com? I thought you found it funny old buddy ol pal
*slides into @OAICgov@twitter.com dms*
So only after contacting @OAICgov@twitter.com and their 'early intake and resolution team' getting in contact with @email@example.com did i actually recieve any response, they said 'sorry for not replying earlier' but when push came to shove they tried to make out like i didn't make a valid request
So, I requested an internal review. this isn't a cia document. we're talking about shidding and farding here. they got it or they dont.
Also hi @firstname.lastname@example.org! you have a request now too!
please don't ignore it like the other mean department did :( https://www.righttoknow.org.au/request/engadine_maccas_redux
You see, @email@example.com already put in a freedom of information request in 2019, and at the time there was no result. Now the story is, "if they exist", i can't have them because they're "not documents of a minister"
PS Cam, can you post the original FOI? 😁
2) @firstname.lastname@example.org & @email@example.com argue that THE VERY TERMS "engadine mcdonalds" & "engadine maccas" do not relate to official business and therefore wont search for them. scomo has made it official business. In addition, any assumed reasons for request are irrelevant per FOI guidelines.
In conclusion, @ScottMorrisonMP@twitter.com absolutely does not, never has joked about this & can't take a joke whatsoever. If he did, he'd release both requests instead of stonewalling.
He can, any time, release these two requests.
Australia, contact your local MP:
Welcome to thundertoot! A Mastodon Instance for 'straya